@article{oai:n-seiryo.repo.nii.ac.jp:00001163,
 author = {半藤, 保 and 小池, 麻夢 and Hando, Tamotsu@@@Koike  Mayu},
 issue = {6},
 journal = {新潟青陵大学紀要},
 month = {Mar},
 note = {application/pdf, 15 nulligravida women with dysmenorrhea, 18-22 years old, were entered in this study. The analgesics of regular use was taken from just before dysmenorrheic discomfort begun to over expected maximum dysmenorrheic menstrual days(method B). Menstrual discomfort under this drug administration such as lower abdominal pain and lumbalgia was compared with those of dysmenorrheic pain under usual pain relief method , administration of analgesics when dysmenorrheic discomfort occurs(method A). The grade of pain was expressed by Wong-Baker face scales assessment method. With method B, more alleviating effect of dysmenorrhea was noticed in 13 among 15 women with method A entered in this study . Two women with method B complained of slight side effect such as drowsiness and reluctant to this forestalling administration of analgesics. The dose of analgesics administered in method B were the same in 4, less in 9, more in 2 compared with method A. It is of special mention that in method B, with even lesser dose of analgesics administered per day, some cases showed more alleviating effect of dysmenorrhea. No remarkable side effect was noticed in method B compared with method A. Ferestalling administration of analgesics to alleviate dysmenorrhea is useful and effective., 18～22歳の未妊婦で、月経困難症を有する15人を対象に､従来から月経困難症出現時に内服していたと同一鎮痛剤を、症状出現前から症状のピークを過ぎる月経周期日まで内服してもらい和痛をはかる先制鎮痛法を試みた。また、同じ和痛法を2月経周期に亘り実施し、その効果を調査した。なお､痛みの程度はWong-Bakerのフェイス・スケール法によって表現した。その結果、従来鎮痛法に比べ､より一層の和通効果を15人中13人に認めた。しかしながら、15人中2人には先制鎮痛法の和痛改善効果を認めなかった。また、15人中3人は和痛効果とは無関係に先制鎮痛法の副作用として、眠気を覚え､新しい鎮痛法に抵抗感があると訴えた。先制鎮痛法は一日あたりの鎮痛薬内服量が､従来法と同量4人、減量9人、増量2人であり、減量しても和痛効果を増強するものがあったことは特筆すべきことであった。先制鎮痛法は従来鎮痛法と比較して、さしたる副作用の増強もなく、一般化されるなら被験者の抵抗感もうすれ、月経困難症に悩む多くの女性に福音をもたらすと考えられた。},
 pages = {7--12},
 title = {先制鎮痛法による月経困難症緩和の試み},
 volume = {6},
 year = {2006}
}